On Thursday 24 April 2008, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Arnd, > here is current syscall table - I only rewrite your changes. I remove sys_ni_syscall except from #ifdefs. > I would like to match syscalls to logical block. Can I do it? (I'll fix unistd.h later) yes, that makes a lot of sense to me. If we introduce a new asm-generic/unistd.h, it's good to have it sorted in some meaningful way, even if it is going to get messier over time. > Can you look at it if I remove old syscalls? > I will continue tomorrow I am tired. ok, I'll look at it tomorrow. > > #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SIGNAL > .long sys_signal > #else > .long sys_ni_syscall > #endif > #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_SYS_TIME > .long sys_time > .long sys_stime > #else > .long sys_ni_syscall > .long sys_ni_syscall > #endif I guess I wasn't entirely clear with what I mean referring to __ARCH_WANT_SYS_*. Instead of adding the #ifdef here, I meant you should just remove the call entirely. With a few exceptions that I already mentioned, the fact that there is an __ARCH_WANT check in the syscall definition means that new architectures should not reference the call, nor #define the __ARCH_WANT macro. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html