On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Will Newton <will.newton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 03:36:23PM +0100, Will Newton wrote: > > > +config ARCH_HAS_SYS_SYSFS > > > + bool > > > + default y > > > + > > > source "init/Kconfig" > > > > > > > Sorry, I meant something more like > > > > > > config ARCH_HAS_SYS_SYSFS > > def_bool !BLACKFIN > > help > > Obsolete sys_sysfs syscall > > > > in init/Kconfig > > > > But, it's your patch, you can do it however you like. :) > > That's definitely shorter - but it feels a bit more like #ifdef > CONFIG_BLACKFIN which is explicitly what I don't want to do, because > I'm not actually interested in blackfin. ;-) i'd have to agree that updating asm/unistd.h fits better with existing paradigm. if we want to talk about converting *all cases* to Kconfig, we can do it in a separate thread. splitting the design between two different files is simply confusing to everyone involved as they spend their time going "well which way am *i* supposed to do it". -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
