Re: [RFC] Introduce __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SYSFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 05:38:19PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > 
> > This should (imnsho, at least),
> >         1 - Add a cond_syscall for sys_sysfs to sys_ni.c
> >         2 - Use a CONFIG_EMBEDDED dependent option that defaults on,
> >             possibly depend on BLACKFIN if you really want to.
> > 
> > Adding this junk to every arch header is, in my opinion, completely
> > unacceptable just because blackfin wants to be different.
> 
> It's not that they want to be different, but rather that I (among others)
> requested that they don't implement obsolete syscalls, so they removed it
> from their syscall table.
> 

Ah, I stupidly assumed sys_sysfs was something to do with /sys.

regards, Kyle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux