Re: [PATCH 1/8] kernel: add common infrastructure for unaligned access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 23:01 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > Actually, you probably _ought_ to have casts, but it should look like this:
> > > 
> > > 	return (u16)p[0] | (u16)p[1] << 8;
> > 
> > I've been looking at that thinking I needed something different, I
> > believe it is ok as u8 will expand to int when shifted... correct?  Or
> > do I actually need the cast on each p[] term...anyone?
> 
> Hmmm... I think you may be right:
> 
> 	#include <stdio.h>
> 
> 	int main()
> 	{
> 		unsigned char x;
> 		printf("%u, %u\n", sizeof(x), sizeof(x << 8));
> 		return 0;
> 	}
> 
> Says:
> 
> 	1, 4
> 
> In which case, the cast you do have is superfluous, and casting the retrievals
> is unnecessary.

Expands to int, not unsigned int, I think that cast is still needed?

Harvey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux