On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 21:37 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:44:08PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote: > > Btw, you may want to look at the current MIPS implementation of > get_unaligned and put_unaligned. It's pure C and at least on MIPS it > produces somewhat shorter code and the source is definately much > shorter since it exploits the compiler's cleverness. > > Ralf Yeah, the only reason I did not is that many arches intentionally bug during the linking process when the argument size is not 1,2,4,8 whereas some do not...it would be nice to get a decision on what is the right answer. Also, I saw the mips version, what would you think of moving to the no_builtin_memcpy version from my patchset...or just look at h3800, xtensa, or m32r arch implementations currently in tree. Cheers, Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
