cris, m68k, mn10300, powerpc, s390, and x86 have efficient unaligned
access. Change their asm includes.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/asm-cris/unaligned.h | 8 +--
include/asm-m68k/unaligned.h | 9 +---
include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h | 126 +--------------------------------------
include/asm-powerpc/unaligned.h | 9 +---
include/asm-s390/unaligned.h | 9 +---
include/asm-x86/unaligned.h | 30 +---------
6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-cris/unaligned.h b/include/asm-cris/unaligned.h
index 7fbbb39..8bd3555 100644
--- a/include/asm-cris/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-cris/unaligned.h
@@ -3,14 +3,8 @@
/*
* CRIS can do unaligned accesses itself.
- *
- * The strange macros are there to make sure these can't
- * be misused in a way that makes them not work on other
- * architectures where unaligned accesses aren't as simple.
*/
-#define get_unaligned(ptr) (*(ptr))
-
-#define put_unaligned(val, ptr) ((void)( *(ptr) = (val) ))
+#include <linux/unaligned/access_ok.h>
#endif
diff --git a/include/asm-m68k/unaligned.h b/include/asm-m68k/unaligned.h
index 804cb3f..94b4a77 100644
--- a/include/asm-m68k/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-m68k/unaligned.h
@@ -3,14 +3,7 @@
/*
* The m68k can do unaligned accesses itself.
- *
- * The strange macros are there to make sure these can't
- * be misused in a way that makes them not work on other
- * architectures where unaligned accesses aren't as simple.
*/
-
-#define get_unaligned(ptr) (*(ptr))
-
-#define put_unaligned(val, ptr) ((void)( *(ptr) = (val) ))
+#include <linux/unaligned/access_ok.h>
#endif
diff --git a/include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h b/include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h
index cad3afb..c377ba0 100644
--- a/include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h
@@ -8,129 +8,9 @@
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
* 2 of the Licence, or (at your option) any later version.
*/
-#ifndef _ASM_UNALIGNED_H
-#define _ASM_UNALIGNED_H
+#ifndef _ASM_MN10300_UNALIGNED_H
+#define _ASM_MN10300_UNALIGNED_H
-#include <asm/types.h>
-
-#if 0
-extern int __bug_unaligned_x(void *ptr);
-
-/*
- * What is the most efficient way of loading/storing an unaligned value?
- *
- * That is the subject of this file. Efficiency here is defined as
- * minimum code size with minimum register usage for the common cases.
- * It is currently not believed that long longs are common, so we
- * trade efficiency for the chars, shorts and longs against the long
- * longs.
- *
- * Current stats with gcc 2.7.2.2 for these functions:
- *
- * ptrsize get: code regs put: code regs
- * 1 1 1 1 2
- * 2 3 2 3 2
- * 4 7 3 7 3
- * 8 20 6 16 6
- *
- * gcc 2.95.1 seems to code differently:
- *
- * ptrsize get: code regs put: code regs
- * 1 1 1 1 2
- * 2 3 2 3 2
- * 4 7 4 7 4
- * 8 19 8 15 6
- *
- * which may or may not be more efficient (depending upon whether
- * you can afford the extra registers). Hopefully the gcc 2.95
- * is inteligent enough to decide if it is better to use the
- * extra register, but evidence so far seems to suggest otherwise.
- *
- * Unfortunately, gcc is not able to optimise the high word
- * out of long long >> 32, or the low word from long long << 32
- */
-
-#define __get_unaligned_2(__p) \
- (__p[0] | __p[1] << 8)
-
-#define __get_unaligned_4(__p) \
- (__p[0] | __p[1] << 8 | __p[2] << 16 | __p[3] << 24)
-
-#define get_unaligned(ptr) \
-({ \
- unsigned int __v1, __v2; \
- __typeof__(*(ptr)) __v; \
- __u8 *__p = (__u8 *)(ptr); \
- \
- switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) { \
- case 1: __v = *(ptr); break; \
- case 2: __v = __get_unaligned_2(__p); break; \
- case 4: __v = __get_unaligned_4(__p); break; \
- case 8: \
- __v2 = __get_unaligned_4((__p+4)); \
- __v1 = __get_unaligned_4(__p); \
- __v = ((unsigned long long)__v2 << 32 | __v1); \
- break; \
- default: __v = __bug_unaligned_x(__p); break; \
- } \
- __v; \
-})
-
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_2(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
- *__p++ = __v;
- *__p++ = __v >> 8;
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_4(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
- __put_unaligned_2(__v >> 16, __p + 2);
- __put_unaligned_2(__v, __p);
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_8(const unsigned long long __v, __u8 *__p)
-{
- /*
- * tradeoff: 8 bytes of stack for all unaligned puts (2
- * instructions), or an extra register in the long long
- * case - go for the extra register.
- */
- __put_unaligned_4(__v >> 32, __p + 4);
- __put_unaligned_4(__v, __p);
-}
-
-/*
- * Try to store an unaligned value as efficiently as possible.
- */
-#define put_unaligned(val, ptr) \
- ({ \
- switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) { \
- case 1: \
- *(ptr) = (val); \
- break; \
- case 2: \
- __put_unaligned_2((val), (__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- case 4: \
- __put_unaligned_4((val), (__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- case 8: \
- __put_unaligned_8((val), (__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- default: \
- __bug_unaligned_x(ptr); \
- break; \
- } \
- (void) 0; \
- })
-
-
-#else
-
-#define get_unaligned(ptr) (*(ptr))
-#define put_unaligned(val, ptr) ({ *(ptr) = (val); (void) 0; })
-
-#endif
+#include <linux/unaligned/access_ok.h>
#endif
diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/unaligned.h b/include/asm-powerpc/unaligned.h
index 6c95dfa..59bcc21 100644
--- a/include/asm-powerpc/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/unaligned.h
@@ -5,15 +5,8 @@
/*
* The PowerPC can do unaligned accesses itself in big endian mode.
- *
- * The strange macros are there to make sure these can't
- * be misused in a way that makes them not work on other
- * architectures where unaligned accesses aren't as simple.
*/
-
-#define get_unaligned(ptr) (*(ptr))
-
-#define put_unaligned(val, ptr) ((void)( *(ptr) = (val) ))
+#include <linux/unaligned/access_ok.h>
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_UNALIGNED_H */
diff --git a/include/asm-s390/unaligned.h b/include/asm-s390/unaligned.h
index 8ee86db..1d4a684 100644
--- a/include/asm-s390/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-s390/unaligned.h
@@ -11,14 +11,7 @@
/*
* The S390 can do unaligned accesses itself.
- *
- * The strange macros are there to make sure these can't
- * be misused in a way that makes them not work on other
- * architectures where unaligned accesses aren't as simple.
*/
-
-#define get_unaligned(ptr) (*(ptr))
-
-#define put_unaligned(val, ptr) ((void)( *(ptr) = (val) ))
+#include <linux/unaligned/access_ok.h>
#endif
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/unaligned.h b/include/asm-x86/unaligned.h
index 913598d..7ba2e1a 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/unaligned.h
@@ -3,35 +3,7 @@
/*
* The x86 can do unaligned accesses itself.
- *
- * The strange macros are there to make sure these can't
- * be misused in a way that makes them not work on other
- * architectures where unaligned accesses aren't as simple.
*/
-
-/**
- * get_unaligned - get value from possibly mis-aligned location
- * @ptr: pointer to value
- *
- * This macro should be used for accessing values larger in size than
- * single bytes at locations that are expected to be improperly aligned,
- * e.g. retrieving a u16 value from a location not u16-aligned.
- *
- * Note that unaligned accesses can be very expensive on some architectures.
- */
-#define get_unaligned(ptr) (*(ptr))
-
-/**
- * put_unaligned - put value to a possibly mis-aligned location
- * @val: value to place
- * @ptr: pointer to location
- *
- * This macro should be used for placing values larger in size than
- * single bytes at locations that are expected to be improperly aligned,
- * e.g. writing a u16 value to a location not u16-aligned.
- *
- * Note that unaligned accesses can be very expensive on some architectures.
- */
-#define put_unaligned(val, ptr) ((void)( *(ptr) = (val) ))
+#include <linux/unaligned/access_ok.h>
#endif /* _ASM_X86_UNALIGNED_H */
--
1.5.5.144.g3e42
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
