arm chooses endianness based on compiler settings.
v850 is le, but does not use the generic c-struct implementation and
uses the byteshifting for both be and le.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/asm-arm/unaligned.h | 166 +-----------------------------------------
include/asm-v850/unaligned.h | 111 +---------------------------
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 273 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-arm/unaligned.h b/include/asm-arm/unaligned.h
index 5db03cf..d5cf478 100644
--- a/include/asm-arm/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-arm/unaligned.h
@@ -1,171 +1,7 @@
#ifndef __ASM_ARM_UNALIGNED_H
#define __ASM_ARM_UNALIGNED_H
-#include <asm/types.h>
-
-extern int __bug_unaligned_x(const void *ptr);
-
-/*
- * What is the most efficient way of loading/storing an unaligned value?
- *
- * That is the subject of this file. Efficiency here is defined as
- * minimum code size with minimum register usage for the common cases.
- * It is currently not believed that long longs are common, so we
- * trade efficiency for the chars, shorts and longs against the long
- * longs.
- *
- * Current stats with gcc 2.7.2.2 for these functions:
- *
- * ptrsize get: code regs put: code regs
- * 1 1 1 1 2
- * 2 3 2 3 2
- * 4 7 3 7 3
- * 8 20 6 16 6
- *
- * gcc 2.95.1 seems to code differently:
- *
- * ptrsize get: code regs put: code regs
- * 1 1 1 1 2
- * 2 3 2 3 2
- * 4 7 4 7 4
- * 8 19 8 15 6
- *
- * which may or may not be more efficient (depending upon whether
- * you can afford the extra registers). Hopefully the gcc 2.95
- * is inteligent enough to decide if it is better to use the
- * extra register, but evidence so far seems to suggest otherwise.
- *
- * Unfortunately, gcc is not able to optimise the high word
- * out of long long >> 32, or the low word from long long << 32
- */
-
-#define __get_unaligned_2_le(__p) \
- (unsigned int)(__p[0] | __p[1] << 8)
-
-#define __get_unaligned_2_be(__p) \
- (unsigned int)(__p[0] << 8 | __p[1])
-
-#define __get_unaligned_4_le(__p) \
- (unsigned int)(__p[0] | __p[1] << 8 | __p[2] << 16 | __p[3] << 24)
-
-#define __get_unaligned_4_be(__p) \
- (unsigned int)(__p[0] << 24 | __p[1] << 16 | __p[2] << 8 | __p[3])
-
-#define __get_unaligned_8_le(__p) \
- ((unsigned long long)__get_unaligned_4_le((__p+4)) << 32 | \
- __get_unaligned_4_le(__p))
-
-#define __get_unaligned_8_be(__p) \
- ((unsigned long long)__get_unaligned_4_be(__p) << 32 | \
- __get_unaligned_4_be((__p+4)))
-
-#define __get_unaligned_le(ptr) \
- ((__force typeof(*(ptr)))({ \
- const __u8 *__p = (const __u8 *)(ptr); \
- __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 1, *__p, \
- __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 2, __get_unaligned_2_le(__p), \
- __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 4, __get_unaligned_4_le(__p), \
- __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 8, __get_unaligned_8_le(__p), \
- (void)__bug_unaligned_x(__p))))); \
- }))
-
-#define __get_unaligned_be(ptr) \
- ((__force typeof(*(ptr)))({ \
- const __u8 *__p = (const __u8 *)(ptr); \
- __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 1, *__p, \
- __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 2, __get_unaligned_2_be(__p), \
- __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 4, __get_unaligned_4_be(__p), \
- __builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(ptr)) == 8, __get_unaligned_8_be(__p), \
- (void)__bug_unaligned_x(__p))))); \
- }))
-
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_2_le(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
- *__p++ = __v;
- *__p++ = __v >> 8;
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_2_be(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
- *__p++ = __v >> 8;
- *__p++ = __v;
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_4_le(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
- __put_unaligned_2_le(__v >> 16, __p + 2);
- __put_unaligned_2_le(__v, __p);
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_4_be(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
- __put_unaligned_2_be(__v >> 16, __p);
- __put_unaligned_2_be(__v, __p + 2);
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_8_le(const unsigned long long __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
- /*
- * tradeoff: 8 bytes of stack for all unaligned puts (2
- * instructions), or an extra register in the long long
- * case - go for the extra register.
- */
- __put_unaligned_4_le(__v >> 32, __p+4);
- __put_unaligned_4_le(__v, __p);
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_8_be(const unsigned long long __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
- /*
- * tradeoff: 8 bytes of stack for all unaligned puts (2
- * instructions), or an extra register in the long long
- * case - go for the extra register.
- */
- __put_unaligned_4_be(__v >> 32, __p);
- __put_unaligned_4_be(__v, __p+4);
-}
-
-/*
- * Try to store an unaligned value as efficiently as possible.
- */
-#define __put_unaligned_le(val,ptr) \
- ({ \
- (void)sizeof(*(ptr) = (val)); \
- switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) { \
- case 1: \
- *(ptr) = (val); \
- break; \
- case 2: __put_unaligned_2_le((__force u16)(val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- case 4: __put_unaligned_4_le((__force u32)(val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- case 8: __put_unaligned_8_le((__force u64)(val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- default: __bug_unaligned_x(ptr); \
- break; \
- } \
- (void) 0; \
- })
-
-#define __put_unaligned_be(val,ptr) \
- ({ \
- (void)sizeof(*(ptr) = (val)); \
- switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) { \
- case 1: \
- *(ptr) = (val); \
- break; \
- case 2: __put_unaligned_2_be((__force u16)(val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- case 4: __put_unaligned_4_be((__force u32)(val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- case 8: __put_unaligned_8_be((__force u64)(val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- default: __bug_unaligned_x(ptr); \
- break; \
- } \
- (void) 0; \
- })
+#include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
/*
* Select endianness
diff --git a/include/asm-v850/unaligned.h b/include/asm-v850/unaligned.h
index e30b186..09fc37c 100644
--- a/include/asm-v850/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-v850/unaligned.h
@@ -17,114 +17,9 @@
#ifndef __V850_UNALIGNED_H__
#define __V850_UNALIGNED_H__
-#include <asm/types.h>
-
-extern int __bug_unaligned_x(void *ptr);
-
-/*
- * What is the most efficient way of loading/storing an unaligned value?
- *
- * That is the subject of this file. Efficiency here is defined as
- * minimum code size with minimum register usage for the common cases.
- * It is currently not believed that long longs are common, so we
- * trade efficiency for the chars, shorts and longs against the long
- * longs.
- *
- * Current stats with gcc 2.7.2.2 for these functions:
- *
- * ptrsize get: code regs put: code regs
- * 1 1 1 1 2
- * 2 3 2 3 2
- * 4 7 3 7 3
- * 8 20 6 16 6
- *
- * gcc 2.95.1 seems to code differently:
- *
- * ptrsize get: code regs put: code regs
- * 1 1 1 1 2
- * 2 3 2 3 2
- * 4 7 4 7 4
- * 8 19 8 15 6
- *
- * which may or may not be more efficient (depending upon whether
- * you can afford the extra registers). Hopefully the gcc 2.95
- * is inteligent enough to decide if it is better to use the
- * extra register, but evidence so far seems to suggest otherwise.
- *
- * Unfortunately, gcc is not able to optimise the high word
- * out of long long >> 32, or the low word from long long << 32
- */
-
-#define __get_unaligned_2(__p) \
- (__p[0] | __p[1] << 8)
-
-#define __get_unaligned_4(__p) \
- (__p[0] | __p[1] << 8 | __p[2] << 16 | __p[3] << 24)
-
-#define get_unaligned(ptr) \
- ({ \
- __typeof__(*(ptr)) __v; \
- __u8 *__p = (__u8 *)(ptr); \
- switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) { \
- case 1: __v = *(ptr); break; \
- case 2: __v = __get_unaligned_2(__p); break; \
- case 4: __v = __get_unaligned_4(__p); break; \
- case 8: { \
- unsigned int __v1, __v2; \
- __v2 = __get_unaligned_4((__p+4)); \
- __v1 = __get_unaligned_4(__p); \
- __v = ((unsigned long long)__v2 << 32 | __v1); \
- } \
- break; \
- default: __v = __bug_unaligned_x(__p); break; \
- } \
- __v; \
- })
-
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_2(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
- *__p++ = __v;
- *__p++ = __v >> 8;
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_4(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
- __put_unaligned_2(__v >> 16, __p + 2);
- __put_unaligned_2(__v, __p);
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_8(const unsigned long long __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
- /*
- * tradeoff: 8 bytes of stack for all unaligned puts (2
- * instructions), or an extra register in the long long
- * case - go for the extra register.
- */
- __put_unaligned_4(__v >> 32, __p+4);
- __put_unaligned_4(__v, __p);
-}
-
-/*
- * Try to store an unaligned value as efficiently as possible.
- */
-#define put_unaligned(val,ptr) \
- ({ \
- switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) { \
- case 1: \
- *(ptr) = (val); \
- break; \
- case 2: __put_unaligned_2((val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- case 4: __put_unaligned_4((val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- case 8: __put_unaligned_8((val),(__u8 *)(ptr)); \
- break; \
- default: __bug_unaligned_x(ptr); \
- break; \
- } \
- (void) 0; \
- })
+#include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
+#define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_le
+#define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_le
#endif /* __V850_UNALIGNED_H__ */
--
1.5.5.144.g3e42
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
