On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 08:23:34PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:55:41 +0100
>
> > @@ -40,6 +41,8 @@
> > #define _PAGE_UNUSED3 (_AC(1, L)<<_PAGE_BIT_UNUSED3)
> > #define _PAGE_PAT (_AC(1, L)<<_PAGE_BIT_PAT)
> > #define _PAGE_PAT_LARGE (_AC(1, L)<<_PAGE_BIT_PAT_LARGE)
> > +#define _PAGE_SPECIAL (_AC(1, L)<<_PAGE_BIT_SPECIAL)
> > +#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL
>
> What tests __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL?
>
> > @@ -167,7 +170,7 @@ static inline pte_t pte_mkhuge(pte_t pte
> > static inline pte_t pte_clrhuge(pte_t pte) { return __pte(pte_val(pte) & ~(pteval_t)_PAGE_PSE); }
> > static inline pte_t pte_mkglobal(pte_t pte) { return __pte(pte_val(pte) | _PAGE_GLOBAL); }
> > static inline pte_t pte_clrglobal(pte_t pte) { return __pte(pte_val(pte) & ~(pteval_t)_PAGE_GLOBAL); }
> > -static inline pte_t pte_mkspecial(pte_t pte) { return pte; }
> > +static inline pte_t pte_mkspecial(pte_t pte) { return __pte(pte_val(pte) | _PAGE_SPECIAL); }
>
> And what calls pte_mkspecial?
>
> I don't see any code that sets the special bit anywhere
> in these two patches.
>
> What am I missing?
Oh, sorry these 2 patches are on top of the previous 7 that I sent out.
Hmm, only patch 2/7 went to linux-arch, which is the main consumer of
this pte_special stuff, however if you want a more coherent view of those
7 patches, they are on linux-mm.
Basically, the pfn-based mapping insertion (vm_insert_pfn, remap_pfn_range)
calls pte_mkspecial. And that tells fast_gup "hands off".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
