Re: [PATCH 5/8] sparc64 ptrace: forced_successful_syscall_return()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!  Please follow up by taking the 7/8 and 8/8 patches as a model and
doing that one-line change to your arch_ptrace/compat_arch_ptrace functions
once the 6/8 generic patch has gone in.  I didn't send those patches for other
arch's than the ones I test myself, but it's just that one line in each
function (replace {compat_,}ptrace_request call with -ENOSYS), plus the
sanity-check testing that ptrace still works.

I sent the forced_successful_syscall_return() change for the affected
arch's I don't build because the 6/8 generic patch would break your arch
without it.


Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux