Hi Russell, On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:54:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:09:43 +0000 Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > As mentioned elsewhere, what we need for ARM is to extend the kautobuild > > infrastructure (see armlinux.simtec.co.uk) so that we can have more trees > > at least compile tested regularly - but that requires the folk there to > > have additional compute power (which isn't going to happen unless folk > > stamp up some machines _or_ funding). > > I now have an arm cross compiler (gcc-4.0.2-glibc-2.3.6 > arm-unknown-linux-gnu). (See the results page at > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/ - I must get a better > name/place :-(.) Is this sufficient to help you out? What configs would > be useful to build (as Andrew said, they don't take very long each). > > I really want as many subsystems as possible in the linux-next tree in an > attempt to avoid some of the merge/conflict problems we have had in the > past. What can we do to help? OK, I tried this out: I built all 75 arm defconfigs with the cross compiler above (the resulting log file is at http://ozlabs.org/~sfr/armall.log.bz2). 17 failed (I don't know why - I didn't even really look). If this is useful, I can get this added to our infrastructure so that every linux-next kernel (and others as well, maybe) will be built for all these. Would that help, Russell? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx P.S. From the timestamps in the log file you can see that this would take around an hour each time.
Attachment:
pgpPxOFgSYpFi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
