Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 15 February 2008, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:32:02 EST, Gene Heskett said:
>> Nvidia vs 2.6.25-rc1 being a case in point, and they (nvidia) are
>> appearing to indicate its not a problem until some distro actually ships a
>> kernel with the changes that broke it.  That could be months or even a
>> year plus.
>
>Actually following the NVidia forums indicates otherwise:
>
>http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=107144
>
>I expect Zander will be posting a patch rather soonish, for some value of
>soonish.  And if you're running a -rc or -mm kernel, patching the 169.09
>drivers should be well within your abilities....

Not so for the binaries, existing patches do make it compile but it still 
upchucks someplace in the binary, or was this time yesterday.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
It is not well to be thought of as one who meekly submits to insolence and
intimidation.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux