On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 03:00:12PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Russell King wrote: > > > Yes, I read that and didn't get the answer to the question above. It's > > unclear how: > > > > config CPU_FREQ_INTEGRATOR > > tristate "CPUfreq driver for ARM Integrator CPUs" > > depends on ARCH_INTEGRATOR && CPU_FREQ > > > > being under CPU_FREQ rather than ARCH_INTEGRATOR > > The doc says it looks at "the previous entry" and ARCH_INTEGRATOR isn't > exactly the previous entry. Neither is CPU_FREQ "the previous entry". The documentation is unclear. > For me it was kind of obvious that kconfig wouldn't arbitrarily reorder > the menu entries. It's always obvious for the person who wrote the code. It isn't for those who haven't. > Only the indentation of an entry is changed not the > whole order. Any contributions to clarify this are more than welcome. Well, I still don't have the necessary understanding to work out how CPU_FREQ is preferred over ARCH_INTEGRATOR, even with your statements that "it is the case". So I'm not in a position to improve the documentation except by adding a sentence to suggest people ask you about it. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
