Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:50:51PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 07:46:51PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>...
> > AFAICS, we are in situation when review bandwidth is where the bottleneck
> > is.  Not the merge one...
> 
> Are there still large numbers of posted patches, not reviewed or picked
> up by anyone laying around somewhere?  I thought Andrew-the-patch-vacuum
> had been doing a great job of keeping that from happening lately.

I wrote in one of the many bug reports I sent for compile errors 
introduced in Linus' tree during this merge window:

An architecture specific patch that breaks the one architecture it 
touches at the first file being compiled is even for kernel standards 
unusually bad...

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux