Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb. 12, 2008, 19:41 +0200, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 09:09 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>  (a) create a base tree with _just_ that fundamental infrastructure change,
>>      and make sure that base branch is so obviously good that there is no 
>>      question about merging it.
> 
> The problem is how do we use a?  Usually we need to track your -rc tree
> as our fixes go in ... some of which affect our development trees.
> 
> If we stick with (a) as the base, we don't get to pull in the fixes in
> your tree.  If we use your tree we have to pull in (a) creating n
> different merge points for the n different upstream trees..

IMHO, this base tree should typically be based off of linus' tree
and kept rebased on top of it.  This way you get the mainline fixes
through the integration base tree.

Benny

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux