On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 21:53 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:37:00 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Why dropping add-mm-argument-to-pte-pmd-pud-pgd_free.patch though ? > > I dropped the whole series. Sniff .. my patches .. ;-) > > It's a sane patch and a helps going further, and a total pain to re-do > > later on. Besides, I may have some use for it on powerpc at some point > > too... > > OK, I'll try to reestablish it. Fine. I've got the patch-merge message, so the first of the series is done. > Look: I can't fix *everyone's* stuff. This was a consequence of ongoing > unbounded churn in the x86 tree. If we can find a way of preventing those > guys (and everyone else) from trashing everyone else's stuff then we'd have > much smoother sailing. Understood. That is where I jump in and regenerate my patches on the latest available level. That the patches did hold up for some months in -mm now without really breaking anything is an indication that we can push them upstream now, isn't ? That would make the patch problem go away and I could queue my s390 specific page table rework. Our KVM people keep asking about it. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
