Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] xtime_lock vs update_process_times

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 12:20 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:39:55AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > move update_process_times() out from under xtime_lock.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Peter,
> 
> Mind if I merge:
> 
> >  arch/arm/common/time-acorn.c          |    2 --
> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c |    3 ---
> >  arch/arm/plat-iop/time.c              |    4 ----
> >  arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/time.c          |    2 --
> 
> with my patch and submit it as part of the ARM merge (which I'm hoping
> to send in about an hours time.)

not at all, please do :-)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux