Re: [patch 2/6] mm: introduce pte_special pte bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:28:39AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > 
> > One fundamental difference is that with the above syntax we always
> > compile both versions of the code - so we do not end up with one
> > version that builds and another version that dont.
> 
> Yes, in that sense it tends to be better to use C language constructs over 
> preprocessor constructs, since error diagnostics and syntax checking is 
> improved.
> 
> So yeah, I'll give you that it can be an improvement. It's just not what I 
> was really hoping for.

Just to clarify - my comment was solely related to the usage
of if (HAVE_*) versus #ifdef.
I had nothing to do with the actual discussion which I do not try to follw .

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux