On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:12:28PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > I have no opinions about the config symbol names. Among the existing > precedents for internal/descriptionless symbols I find more not using the > HAVE_ prefix than those using it. The convention is newly established - so no suprise. > The patch versions I've sent now work > fine, fix the parallel build problem people were seeing, and AFAICT follow > the style of what's already in common use. At this point, I think it would > be easiest just to keep them and have you send symbol-renaming patches > for any and all symbols of this sort that concern you as separate cleanups. Would love to - but the pile of other kbuild stuff only gets bigger.. Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
