Re: [patch 2/3] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Can we please just nuke CONFIG_HIGHPTE?  There's only been a small
> > amount of 32bit machines with so much memory that they'd need it
> > and they can happily stay on the currently supported enterprise
> > distro releases instead of dragging this cruft around forever.
> 
> And all MMU-equipped FR-V machines with more than 256 MiB of RAM,
> according to arch/frv/Kconfig?

ppc32 uses that too when highmem is on.

Ben.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux