* Russell King (rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 02:27:05PM -0800, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > It would be much better to do > > > > depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_KPROBES > > > > in that generic file, and then architectures that do support it would just > > have a > > > > bool ARCH_SUPPORTS_KPROBES > > default y > > I thought we were discussing the prefix to use, and settling on HAVE_xxx > rather than ARCH_SUPPORTS_xxx. > The latest version I sent uses HAVE_xxx see : http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/844040?do=post_view_threaded (and other messages in that thread) Mathieu > -- > Russell King > Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ > maintainer of: -- Mathieu Desnoyers Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
