On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 06:07:22PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:57:30 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I have an updated patchset for these 4 instrumentation menu patches, > > following Sam Ravnborg's comments (using ARCH_HAS_* instead of > > ARCH_SUPPORTS_*). I was planning to send them with my next patch round. > > > > create-arch-kconfig.patch > > add-arch_supports_oprofile.patch > > add-arch_supports_kprobes.patch > > move-kconfiginstrumentation-to-arch-kconfig-and-init-kconfig.patch > > So I've fixed all the rejects, fixed it all up for the arch/x86/Kconfig > churn, merged another patchset which depends on this one and now I'm told > that they need to be updated? Well, the discussion on linux-arch about what to use started some 11 hours before your original merge mail. Maybe you missed it? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
