On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, David Miller wrote: > From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:12:11 -0700 (PDT) > > > On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, David Miller wrote: > > > > > All I can do now is bisect and then try to figure out what about the > > > guilty change might cause the problem. > > > > Reverting the 7th patch should avoid using the sparc register that caches > > the per cpu area offset? (I though so, does it?) > > Yes, that's right, %g5 holds the local cpu's per-cpu offset. And if I add the address of a percpu variable then I get to the variable for this cpu right? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
