On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 02:46:51PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 11:27:30 -0700
> Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 6:53 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Fixing the syscall number value.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 9e7f74e64ae5 ("selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall call from user space test")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> >
> > is this selftest in probes/for-next already? If yes, I'd combine these
> > two patches to avoid any bisection problems
yes it's all there.. I don't mind squashing it, I just did not want
to combine kernel and user space parts.. up to Masami I guess
> >
> > but either way
> >
> > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks, let me pick it to for-next branch.
thanks,
jirka
>
> Thank you,
>
> >
> >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> > > index c8517c8f5313..bd8c75b620c2 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> > > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static void test_uretprobe_regs_change(void)
> > > }
> > >
> > > #ifndef __NR_uretprobe
> > > -#define __NR_uretprobe 463
> > > +#define __NR_uretprobe 467
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > __naked unsigned long uretprobe_syscall_call_1(void)
> > > --
> > > 2.45.2
> > >
>
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
