On Mar 13, 2024 Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > LSM: use 32 bit compatible data types in LSM syscalls. > > Change the size parameters in lsm_list_modules(), lsm_set_self_attr() > and lsm_get_self_attr() from size_t to u32. This avoids the need to > have different interfaces for 32 and 64 bit systems. > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fixes: a04a1198088a: ("LSM: syscalls for current process attributes") > Fixes: ad4aff9ec25f: ("LSM: Create lsm_list_modules system call") > Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-and-reviewed-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 4 ++-- > include/linux/security.h | 8 ++++---- > security/apparmor/lsm.c | 4 ++-- > security/lsm_syscalls.c | 10 +++++----- > security/security.c | 12 ++++++------ > security/selinux/hooks.c | 4 ++-- > security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 4 ++-- > tools/testing/selftests/lsm/common.h | 6 +++--- > tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_get_self_attr_test.c | 10 +++++----- > tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_list_modules_test.c | 8 ++++---- > tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_set_self_attr_test.c | 6 +++--- > 11 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) Okay, this looks better, I'm going to merge this into lsm/stable-6.9 and put it through the usual automated testing as well as a kselftest run to make sure everything there is still okay. Assuming all goes well and no one raises any objections, I'll likely send this up to Linus tomorrow. Thanks everyone! -- paul-moore.com