On 01/27, Tycho Andersen wrote: > > > > > exit_notify() is called after exit_files(). pidfd_getfd() returns > > > > ESRCH if the exiting thread completes release_task(), otherwise it > > > > returns EBADF because ->files == NULL. This too doesn't really > > > > depend on PIDFD_THREAD. > > > > > > Yup, understood. It just seems like an inconsistency we might want to > > > fix. > > > > Not sure this worth "fixing"... > > Yep, maybe not. Just wanted to point it out. On the second thought I am starting to understand your concern... Indeed, in this case -EBADF is technically correct but it can confuse the user which doesn't or can't know that this task/thread is exiting, because EBADF looks as if the "int fd" argument was wrong. Sorry I missed your point before. Oleg.
