On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 6:47 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> As LSMs are registered add their lsm_id pointers to a table.
> This will be used later for attribute reporting.
>
> Determine the number of possible security modules based on
> their respective CONFIG options. This allows the number to be
> known at build time. This allows data structures and tables
> to use the constant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/security.h | 2 ++
> security/security.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
...
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 58828a326024..aa84b1cf4253 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -513,6 +531,16 @@ void __init security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
> {
> int i;
>
> + /*
> + * A security module may call security_add_hooks() more
> + * than once. Landlock is one such case.
> + */
> + if (lsm_active_cnt == 0 || lsm_idlist[lsm_active_cnt - 1] != lsmid)
> + lsm_idlist[lsm_active_cnt++] = lsmid;
> +
> + if (lsm_active_cnt > LSM_COUNT)
> + panic("%s Too many LSMs registered.\n", __func__);
In addition to the fixes needed to resolve the bug identified by the
kernel test robot, I think it might be wise to do the @lsm_active_cnt
check *before* potentially adding it to the @lsm_idlist array.
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> hooks[i].lsmid = lsmid;
> hlist_add_tail_rcu(&hooks[i].list, hooks[i].head);
> --
> 2.39.2
--
paul-moore.com
