Hi Branden, On 2/15/23 03:21, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > At 2023-02-15T02:52:03+0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: >> On 2/15/23 02:20, G. Branden Robinson wrote: >>> [CC list violently trimmed; for those who remain, this is mostly man >>> page style issues] >> >> Ironically, you trimmed linux-man@ :D > > I didn't! It wasn't present in the mail to which I repled. Hmm, you're right, Mathieu didn't CC linux-man@. I guessed somewhere in that big list it would be there, but it wasn't. Thanks for CCing it. > > This did puzzle me. I guess it was an oversight. You might want to > re-send that message of yours, and/or Mathieu's, if it lacked it too. > > Or maybe it doesn't matter because lore.kernel.org finds all. I just > used it to track down an exchange between Michael Kerrisk and me that > GMail refused to find even though it was in my inbox. It showed me only > one thread, didn't highlight the specific message that it thought > matched, and showed me the _wrong_ thread on top of everything else. > The word "constraint" was in the thread I wanted, not in the one I > didn't, and even when I quoted it I was served up an incorrect match. Which reminds me that I hate searching in the groff@ archives. It's not because of the search engine, but because of the thread view. You are artificially restricted to a given month, and you can't see entire threads in the search engine. Is there anything similar to lore for groff@? Other GNU projects can now be searched at <https://inbox.sourceware.org/> such as <https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/>, but groff@ isn't there :( Cheers, Alex > > Clearly their AI efforts are going swimmingly.> > Regards, > Branden -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
