On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 7:33 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> OK, but then the ignore_sig change should not be needed at all, just
> changing that first bit to fatal_signal_pending() would do the trick?
Right. That was my point. The 'ignore_sig' flag just doesn't make
sense. It was a hack for a case that shouldn't exist.
Linus
