On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 01:22:44PM -0800, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> +void fpregs_lock_and_load(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * fpregs_lock() only disables preemption (mostly). So modifying state
> + * in an interrupt could screw up some in progress fpregs operation,
> + * but appear to work. Warn about it.
I don't like comments where it sounds like we don't know what we're
doing. "Appear to work"?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
