On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 2:47 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add an integer member "features" to the struct lsm_id which
> identifies the API related data associated with each security
> module. The initial set of features maps to information that
> has traditionaly been available in /proc/self/attr.
>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/lsm.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> security/apparmor/lsm.c | 1 +
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 ++
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
Everything Greg already said with one additional comment below.
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index dd4b4d95a172..46b2aa6a677e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -1608,6 +1608,7 @@ struct security_hook_heads {
> struct lsm_id {
> const char *lsm; /* Name of the LSM */
> int id; /* LSM ID */
> + int features; /* Set of LSM features */
I understand why you called the field "features", but I worry it is a
bit too generic for 32-bits of flags. Let's make it specific to the
LSM label attributes; how about 'feat_attr', 'sup_attr', or something
along those lines?
--
paul-moore.com
