On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:36:34PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > >> + * > >> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> + * Copyright (C) Intel Corporation > > No date for Intel? > > The latest guidance I have received is that Intel does not want a date. Ok, then I need to have an Intel lawyer sign off on a patch that does this in order to have that be their official statement. Otherwise, it needs a date. > >> + */ > >> + > >> +#ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_LSM_H > >> +#define _UAPI_LINUX_LSM_H > >> + > >> +/* > >> + * ID values to identify security modules. > >> + * A system may use more than one security module. > >> + * > >> + * LSM_ID_XXX values 0 - 31 are reserved for future use > > Reserved for what? Why? > > You're not the first person to ask. And the answer is? > I'll remove the reserved values for the next version. Because we asked it will be removed? confused, greg k-h