On 10/3/22 12:35, John Hubbard wrote: > It's always a judgment call, as to whether to use something like ``CALL` > or just plain CALL. Here, I'd like to opine that that the benefits of > ``CALL`` are very small, whereas plain text in cet.rst has been made > significantly worse. So the result is, "this is not worth it". I'm definitely in this camp as well. Unless the markup *really* adds to readability, just leave it alone.
