On 9/30/22 20:33, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> CET introduces Shadow Stack and Indirect Branch Tracking. Shadow stack is >> a secondary stack allocated from memory and cannot be directly modified by >> -applications. When executing a CALL instruction, the processor pushes the >> +applications. When executing a ``CALL`` instruction, the processor pushes the > > Just to be clear, not everybody is fond of sprinkling lots of ``literal > text`` throughout the documentation in this way. Heavy use of it will > certainly clutter the plain-text file and can be a net negative overall. > Actually there is a trade-off between semantic correctness and plain-text clarity. With regards to inline code samples (like identifiers), I fall into the former camp. But when I'm reviewing patches for which the surrounding documentation go latter camp (leave code samples alone without markup), I can adapt to that style as long as it causes no warnings whatsover. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
