On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 01:40:11PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > Yeah, ok. That does make some sense. So we would mix this into the > i_version instead of the ctime when it was available. Preferably, we'd > mix that in when we store the i_version rather than adding it afterward. > > Ted, how would we access this? Maybe we could just add a new (generic) > super_block field for this that ext4 (and other filesystems) could > populate at mount time? Couldn't the filesystem just return an ino_version that already includes it? --b.
