Re: [PATCH v7 00/14] KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM guest private memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Actually the current version allows you to delay the allocation to a
later time (e.g. page fault time) if you don't call fallocate() on the
private fd. fallocate() is necessary in previous versions because we
treat the existense in the fd as 'private' but in this version we track
private/shared info in KVM so we don't rely on that fact from memory
backstores.

Does this also mean reservation of guest physical memory with secure
processor (both for SEV-SNP & TDX) will also happen at page fault time?

Do we plan to keep it this way?

If you are talking about accepting memory by the guest, it is initiated by
the guest and has nothing to do with page fault time vs fallocate()
allocation of host memory. I mean acceptance happens after host memory
allocation but they are not in lockstep, acceptance can happen much later.

No, I meant reserving guest physical memory range from hypervisor e.g with
RMPUpdate for SEV-SNP or equivalent at TDX side (PAMTs?).

As proposed, RMP/PAMT updates will occur in the fault path, i.e. there is no way
for userspace to pre-map guest memory.

I think the best approach is to turn KVM_TDX_INIT_MEM_REGION into a generic
vCPU-scoped ioctl() that allows userspace to pre-map guest memory.  Supporting
initializing guest private memory with a source page can be implemented via a
flag.  That also gives KVM line of sight to in-place "conversion", e.g. another
flag could be added to say that the dest is also the source.

Questions to clarify *my* understanding here:

- Do you suggest to use KVM_TDX_INIT_MEM_REGION into a generic ioctl to
  pre-map guest private memory in addition to initialize the payload
  (in-place encryption or just copy page to guest private memory)?

- Want to clarify "pre-map": Are you suggesting to use the ioctl
  to avoid the RMP/PAMT registration at guest page fault time? instead
  pre-map guest private memory i.e to allocate and do RMP/PAMT
  registration before running the actual guest vCPU's?

Thanks,
Pankaj


The TDX and SNP restrictions would then become addition restrictions on when
initializing with a source is allowed (and VMs that don't have guest private
memory wouldn't allow the flag at all).





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux