Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/5] sched: User Managed Concurrency Groups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/5] sched: User Managed Concurrency Groups
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 09:20:20 +0100
Cc: mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx, vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx, dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx, bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxx, bristot@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, pjt@xxxxxxxxxx, posk@xxxxxxxxxx, avagin@xxxxxxxxxx, jannh@xxxxxxxxxx, tdelisle@xxxxxxxxxxxx, mark.rutland@xxxxxxx, posk@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20220121130145.1bba70d3@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20220120155517.066795336@infradead.org> <20220121130145.1bba70d3@gandalf.local.home>

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 01:01:45PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> Should the below be added to samples/ ?

Maybe eventually, it needs a little TLC to build with clang at the very
least.

References:
- [RFC][PATCH v2 0/5] sched: User Managed Concurrency Groups
  - From: Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/5] sched: User Managed Concurrency Groups
  - From: Steven Rostedt

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] rseq: Fix broken uapi field layout on 32-bit little endian
Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 5/5] sched: User Mode Concurency Groups
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/5] sched: User Managed Concurrency Groups
Next by thread: [merged] mm-mempolicy-use-policy_node-helper-with-mpol_preferred_many.patch removed from -mm tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux