On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 05:21:00PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 1.09.21 г. 20:01, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > From: Boris Burkov <boris@xxxxxx> > > > > Send stream v2 can emit fallocate commands, so receive must support them > > as well. The implementation simply passes along the arguments to the > > syscall. Note that mode is encoded as a u32 in send stream but fallocate > > takes an int, so there is a unsigned->signed conversion there. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@xxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx> > > However, kernel support for this hasn't landed, the kernel counterpart > patches add definitions but don't actually implement the code. BY the > looks of it it would seem that the proper send stream versioning could > be added first before any of this code lands. In this case we can simply > have the encoded writes stuff as protocol version 2 and leave the rest > of the commands for v3 for example. The original idea for this was to minimize protocol revisions. This way, when we get around to implementing fallocate on the send side, we wouldn't need another update on the receive side. I still like that idea since the receive side is so trivial.
