On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 07:10:43PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Prevent exec continuing when a fatal signal is pending by replacing > mmap_read_lock with mmap_read_lock_killable. This is always the right > thing to do as userspace will never observe an exec complete when > there is a fatal signal pending. > > With that change it becomes unnecessary to explicitly test for a core > dump in progress. In coredump_wait zap_threads arranges under > mmap_write_lock for all tasks that use a mm to also have SIGKILL > pending, which means mmap_read_lock_killable will always return -EINTR > when old_mm->core_state is present. > > Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/exec.c | 14 ++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c > index a098c133d8d7..b6079f1a098e 100644 > --- a/fs/exec.c > +++ b/fs/exec.c > @@ -987,16 +987,14 @@ static int exec_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm) > > if (old_mm) { > /* > - * Make sure that if there is a core dump in progress > - * for the old mm, we get out and die instead of going > - * through with the exec. We must hold mmap_lock around > - * checking core_state and changing tsk->mm. > + * If there is a pending fatal signal perhaps a signal > + * whose default action is to create a coredump get > + * out and die instead of going through with the exec. > */ > - mmap_read_lock(old_mm); > - if (unlikely(old_mm->core_state)) { > - mmap_read_unlock(old_mm); > + ret = mmap_read_lock_killable(old_mm); This appears to ultimately call into rwsem_down_read_slowpath(), which checks signal_pending_state() (and returns the EINTR from before), so this looks right to me. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -Kees > + if (ret) { > up_write(&tsk->signal->exec_update_lock); > - return -EINTR; > + return ret; > } > } > > -- > 2.20.1 > -- Kees Cook