Hi Peter, Às 11:07 de 15/09/21, Peter Zijlstra escreveu: > Hi, > > Neither Thomas nor myself much liked that futex2.c nor do we think that CONFIG_ > symbol makes much sense. > > However, futex.c is a wee bit long and splitting it up makes sense. So I've > taken the liberty to replace your initial patch with 15 of my own and then > rebased the remaining patches on top of that. > Thank you for doing that. futex.c is indeed too big and I believe that this really make the code easier to read, and the way you organized makes more sense than the way I did. Maybe even robust could have a separated file? Thanks, André
