On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 07:28:11AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > This is really the same thing as before, just the names have changed. > What I suggested was keeping the enum in io_uring, then just adding > > enum { > IO_WQ_BOUND, > IO_WQ_UNBOUND, > }; > > to uapi header. The ACCT stuff is io-wq specific too, that kind of naming > shouldn't be propagated to userspace. My apologies, I've overlooked the fact that the proposed names are different. Updated and resent[1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210913154415.GA12890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > A BUILD_BUG_ON() could be added for them being different, but honestly > I don't think that's worth it.