Re: lsattr: incorrect size for ioctl result

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:44 AM Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Which raises the question "why is there an IOC32 version of this when it was
> never NOT 32 bit" and "does GETFLAGS have the same problem"? (Haven't looked...)

Yes, GET/SETFLAGS also read and store int-sized value.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux