On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:08 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > Documentation patches can help to guide that discussion; they also need > to be reviewed as well. So yes, I think they should be present from the > beginning. But then, that's the position I'm supposed to take :) This > is a big change to the kernel's system-call API, I don't think that > there can be a proper discussion of that without a description of what > you're trying to do. Hi Jon, There are doc comments in patches 2 and 7 in umcg.c documenting the new syscalls. That said, I'll prepare a separate doc patch - I guess I'll add Documentation/scheduler/umcg.rst, unless you tell me there is a better place to do that. ETA mid-to-late next week. Thanks, Peter
