Nicholas Piggin via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > As a more hacky thing you could make a syscall with -1 and see how > the error looks, and then assume all syscalls will be the same. I'm not sure this would work. Even in glibc, it's expected that early syscalls will use sc while scv is used later in the execution. -- Tulio Magno