On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 02:13 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 06:12:01PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > [...] > > - Error handling: The consensus among kernel, glibc, and musl is to move to > > using negative return values in r3 rather than CR0[SO]=1 to indicate error, > > which matches most other architectures, and is closer to a function call. What about syscalls like times(2) which can return -1 without it being an error? Jocke
