On Tue 09-02-21 11:23:35, David Hildenbrand wrote: [...] > I am constantly trying to fight for making more stuff MOVABLE instead of > going into the other direction (e.g., because it's easier to implement, > which feels like the wrong direction). > > Maybe I am the only person that really cares about ZONE_MOVABLE these days > :) I can't stop such new stuff from popping up, so at least I want it to be > documented. MOVABLE zone is certainly an important thing to keep working. And there is still quite a lot of work on the way. But as I've said this is more of a outlier than a norm. On the other hand movable zone is kinda hard requirement for a lot of application and it is to be expected that many features will be less than 100% compatible. Some usecases even impossible. That's why I am arguing that we should have a central document where the movable zone is documented with all the potential problems we have encountered over time and explicitly state which features are fully/partially incompatible. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
