Re: [PATCH v5 41/42] tests: extend mount_setattr tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,


On 1/12/21 2:01 PM, Christian Brauner wrote:
> ---
> /* v2 */
> patch introduced
> 
> /* v3 */
> - Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>   - Port main test-suite to xfstests.
> 
> /* v4 */
> unchanged
> 
> /* v5 */
> base-commit: 7c53f6b671f4aba70ff15e1b05148b10d58c2837
> ---
>  .../mount_setattr/mount_setattr_test.c        | 483 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 483 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mount_setattr/mount_setattr_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mount_setattr/mount_setattr_test.c
> index 447b91c05cbd..4e94e566e040 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mount_setattr/mount_setattr_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mount_setattr/mount_setattr_test.c
> @@ -108,15 +108,57 @@ struct mount_attr {
>  	__u64 attr_set;
>  	__u64 attr_clr;
>  	__u64 propagation;
> +	__u64 userns_fd;
>  };
>  #endif

...


Does "/**" have any special meaning inside tools/testing/ and the
selftest framework?  (I don't see any other such users.)

If not, can you just use the usual "/*" instead? (multiple locations)


> +/**
> + * Validate that negative fd values are rejected.
> + */
> +TEST_F(mount_setattr_idmapped, invalid_fd_negative)
> +{
...

> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Validate that excessively large fd values are rejected.
> + */
> +TEST_F(mount_setattr_idmapped, invalid_fd_large)
> +{
...

> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Validate that closed fd values are rejected.
> + */
> +TEST_F(mount_setattr_idmapped, invalid_fd_closed)
> +{
...

> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Validate that the initial user namespace is rejected.
> + */
> +TEST_F(mount_setattr_idmapped, invalid_fd_initial_userns)
> +{
...

> +/**
> + * Validate that an attached mount in our mount namespace can be idmapped.
> + * (The kernel enforces that the mount's mount namespace and the caller's mount
> + *  namespace match.)
> + */
> +TEST_F(mount_setattr_idmapped, attached_mount_inside_current_mount_namespace)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Validate that idmapping a mount is rejected if the mount's mount namespace
> + * and our mount namespace don't match.
> + * (The kernel enforces that the mount's mount namespace and the caller's mount
> + *  namespace match.)
> + */
> +TEST_F(mount_setattr_idmapped, attached_mount_outside_current_mount_namespace)
> +{
...

> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Validate that an attached mount in our mount namespace can be idmapped.
> + */
> +TEST_F(mount_setattr_idmapped, detached_mount_inside_current_mount_namespace)
> +{
...

> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Validate that a detached mount not in our mount namespace can be idmapped.
> + */
> +TEST_F(mount_setattr_idmapped, detached_mount_outside_current_mount_namespace)
> +{
...

> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Validate that currently changing the idmapping of an idmapped mount fails.
> + */
> +TEST_F(mount_setattr_idmapped, change_idmapping)
> +{


thanks.
-- 
~Randy
You can't do anything without having to do something else first.
-- Belefant's Law




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux