> From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reading this, it really doesn't feel like a clean API. I think it would be great if > you could investigate whether you can get a more flexible and cleaner design > on top of memfds as suggested elsewhere in the thread. The API may be dirty, and that can be fixed. Any suggestion is appreciated. But the implementation underneath has a whole other purpose than just sharing memory. Doing a design on top of memfd will surely make some people happy. Don't know what to say about replacing the QEMU allocator though. Mircea
