Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH 0/5] Remote mapping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 02:31:11PM +0300, Adalbert Lazăr wrote:
> VMAs obtained by mmap()ing memory access fds mirror the contents of the remote
> process address space within the specified range. Pages are installed in the
> current process page tables at fault time and removed by the mmu_interval_notifier
> invalidate callbck. No further memory management is involved.
> On attempts to access a hole, or if a mapping was removed by PIDFD_MEM_UNMAP,
> or if the remote process address space was reaped by OOM, the remote mapping
> fault handler returns VM_FAULT_SIGBUS.

I still think anything along these lines needs to meet the XPMEM use
cases as well, we have to have more general solutions for such MM
stuff:

https://gitlab.com/hjelmn/xpmem

However, I think this fundamentally falls into some of the same bad
direction as xpmem.

I would much rather see this design copy & clone the VMA's than try to
mirror the PTEs inside the VMAs from the remote into a single giant
VMA and somehow split/mirror the VMA ops.

This is just too weird and fragile to be maintaible over a long
term.

For instance, one of the major bugs in things like xpmem was that they
are incompatible with get_user_pages(), largely because of this issue.

I feel like I said this already..

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux