On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 1:19 PM Pascal Bouchareine <kalou@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:59 PM Pascal Bouchareine <kalou@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Would it make sense to also make UDIAG_SHOW_NAME use sk_description? > > (And keep the existing change - setsockopt + show_fd_info via > > /proc/.../fdinfo/..) > > > Ah,very wrong example - to be more precise, I suppose that'd be adding > a couple idiag_ext for sk_description and pid if possible instead About the pid part - On top of multiple pids to scan for a given socket, there's also the security provided by /proc - I'm not sure what inet_diag does for that So maybe users calling it will need to scan /proc for a long time anyway... Or is that doable?
