On 7/24/20 9:49 AM, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 6c4ab4d..ef13df4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ typedef int (dio_iodone_t)(struct kiocb *iocb, loff_t offset,
> /* File does not contribute to nr_files count */
> #define FMODE_NOACCOUNT ((__force fmode_t)0x20000000)
>
> +/* File can support zone-append */
> +#define FMODE_ZONE_APPEND ((__force fmode_t)0x40000000)
This conflicts with the async buffered read support in linux-next that
has been queued up for a long time.
> @@ -315,6 +318,7 @@ enum rw_hint {
> #define IOCB_SYNC (1 << 5)
> #define IOCB_WRITE (1 << 6)
> #define IOCB_NOWAIT (1 << 7)
> +#define IOCB_ZONE_APPEND (1 << 8)
Ditto this one, and that also clashes with mainline. The next available
bit would be 10, IOCB_WAITQ and IOCB_NOIO are 8 and 9.
--
Jens Axboe
